This is an open editorial about the issues on reproducibility and the current publication system that led us to launch the Journal for Reproduciblity in Neuroscience.
References
Walter P, Mullins D. From symbiont to parasite: the evolution of for-profit science publishing. Mol Biol Cell. 2019 Sep 15;30(20):2537–42.
Brembs B. Reliable novelty: New should not trump true. PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb;17(2):e3000117.
Archambault É, Larivière V. History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics. 2009 Jun 1;79(3):635–49.
Open Science Collaboration. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015 Aug 28;349(6251):aac4716.
Kaiser J. Plan to replicate 50 high-impact cancer papers shrinks to just 18 [Internet]. Science. 2018. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aau9619
Brembs B. Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Feb 20;12:37.
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-SA 4.0)
